A
failing on all
Macro-Economic indicators
By Dr. Bharat Jariwala
The
Prime Minister, at his recent press-conference said that “under UPA
Government, Macro-Economic indicators are Robust.” However the fact
is that this Government has failed on all macro-economic indicators,
as per their own goals or 10th plan or as past performance of NDA
Government. Here are a few data-based factual examples.
1.
GDP Growth Rate
The
UPA set 8 per cent GDP growth rate in their CMP as per 10th Plan document.
But they could achieve only 6.9 per cent growth rate in 2004-5, which
is much lower than 8.4 per cent achieved by NDA in 2003-4. The current
year 2005-6 is no different as per RBI’s predictions.
In
Service Sector and Agriculture, UPA’s growth rates were lower in 2004-5
than previous year and in current year they are falling in many sectors
like Power Generation, Mining etc. Can we call this Robust performance?
2.
Inflation (Price-Rise)
During
NDA’s 5-year period, the average inflation was 3.9 per cent. However,
during the 21 months of UPA Government, the average inflation is around
6 per cent, highest being 8.7 per cent on August 28, 2004. Even today,
it is 4.5 per cent. This is because UPA is not in a position to check
price-rise, e.g. Government itself increased petrol and diesel prices
six-times, cement prices have soared from Rs. 110 per 50 kg bag in
April 2004 to Rs. 185 today, prices of steel, aluminum, bricks, cooking
gas, gold, silver, coal etc. have increased phenomenally; resulting
in increased cost of transport and housing. Even Government recently
increased prices of PDS food -grains supplied to Above-Poverty-Line
(APL) families. Who cares for the common-man in this Government?
3.
Agricultural Economy
Time
and again, Government talked about giving thrust to Agricultural Economy.
But in first year of UPA, Agricultural growth rate collapsed to 1.1
per cent, against NDA’s 9.6 per cent in the previous year. NDA achieved
full self-sufficiency in food-grain productions and India could export
food grains of $ 6 billion every year consecutively for three years
from 2001-2 to 2003-4, for the first time in the history.
Ironically,
the situation has deteriorated under UPA and they had to import 5
lakh tonnes of wheat this year, thereby falling prey to foreign dependence
again. How will they achieve 4 per cent growth of 10th plan ?
NDA
increased food-subsidy from Rs. 9,600 crores in 1999-2000 to Rs. 26,000
crores in 2003-4, to provide adequate food-grains to poor. However,
UPA has now decided to reduce the food-subsidy by Rs. 4,524 crores
and also cut the monthly quota of food-grains to Below-Poverty-Line
(BPL) and APL families.
Thirdly,
as per NSS latest data , 49 per cent of Indian farmers are heavily
in debt e.g. Andhra – 82 per cent, Tamil Nadu – 75 per cent, Punjab
and Kerala- 65 per cent, Karnataka- 61 per cent etc. Due to indebtedness,
over 4,000 farmers committed suicide in UPA’s first year of 2004-5,
despite their announcements of providing higher allocation of bank-credit.
By
any standard, can the above three Agricultural Indicators be called
robust?
4.
Trade Deficit
The
Trade Deficit i.e. gap between export and import, in 2003-4 under
NDA, was $15 billion. This doubled to $29 billion under UPA in 2004-5
and is likely to treble to $45 billion this year. The tremendous increase
in import is not due to oil imports as talked about by Government,
but due to non-oil imports. In first 9 months, oil import is $31 billion,
but non-oil import is $65 billion. This conveys that Government has
failed to increase exports and contain imports, which has a serious
repercussion on Rupee Value.
5.
Balance of Payment
India’s
current account deficit now is as high as 3 per cent of GDP, which
can seriously damage our economy. Current Account deficit depends
on Merchandise Account and inflow and outflow on invisibles. In NDA’s
time, it was positive at 2.3 per cent of GDP, which has now nose-dived
by 5-3 per cent to –3 per cent. But for NRI remittances, this would
have been much higher.
In
1997, the South-East Asian countries had large Current Account deficits
and they faced serious Balance of Payment crisis then, with sudden
outflow of large money, resulting in devaluation of their currencies.
It is necessary to strengthen rupee abroad.
6.
Revenue Deficit
The
Common Minimum Programme of UPA vowed to bring down revenue deficit
to zero in 3 years by 2007 and fiscal deficit to zero by 2009. However
revenue deficit has remained at the same level of 2.7 per cent of
GDP for last 2 years. Same is the case with fiscal deficit. This means
that Government will have to resort to more market-borrowings. Thus,
Government has failed on fiscal consolidation – another important
macro-indicator.
7.
Disinvestments
UPA
is completely helpless to go ahead with disinvestment process due
to dictates of Communists. NDA had Rs. 15,500 crores of disinvestment
in 2003-4, but UPA had only Rs. 2,765 crores in 2004-5. Current year
is no different.
Airport
privatisation or modernisation blockade by communist trade unions
is a recent example. Can these be called Reforms?
Economy
Robust – Far from the truth
There
are many areas like employment, water, power-sector, rural infrastructure,
resource-crunch etc, where the Government has failed to keep their
promises to the people.
(The
writer is a renowned economist and member, BJP Central Economic Cell)