Apartheid
against majority
By Chandan Mitra
|
| Clearly,
the Government is telling the country’s endangered majority: Aren’t
you ashamed to be the majority? If you still aren’t, just wait,
we’ll soon make it impossible for you to live here. |
For
decades, we have been extolling the virtues of positive discrimination,
arguing that it is the most effective method of assisting underprivileged
sections of society attain a degree of equality in societies where
they have been historically wronged. Blacks in the US, non-White immigrants
to European countries and even natives of South Africa have benefited
from this policy.
In
India, we went many steps further by opting for the politically lucrative
reservation route. While there is much to be said for job quotas for
Dalits and Tribals who have been disprivileged for millennia, the
grounds for extending the same prescription to other castes and communities
remain dubious, if not outrightly opportunistic. I am referring specifically
to the implementation of the Mandal Report and the sinister move to
reserve jobs for Muslims in certain States. All these actions have
been justified in the name of positive discrimination.
So
far, so good. But in the last few months, the last seven days in particular,
the UPA Government has gone on an overdrive. Taken cumulatively with
the measures it has taken or proposes to introduce, a clear signal
has been sent out to the ordinary Indian, the average citizen of this
country who does not belong to a minority or privileged caste. It
may surprise the Arjun Singhs, A.R. Antulays and even the Manmohan
Singhs to know that there still exist a large number of common Indians
who are, in fact, the majority in this country. Thanks to this Government,
they cannot run unaided educational institutions free of quotas. Thanks
to this Government, it is a matter of time that minority quotas are
introduced in recruiting youngsters to the Army. Thanks to this Government,
illegal immigration from a neighbouring country (which has been called
“external aggression” by the Supreme Court) will be immensely facilitated
through an amendment to the Foreigners’ Act. And, thanks to this Government,
caste-based job quotas may soon be introduced even in the private
sector.
Clearly,
the Government is telling the country’s endangered majority: Aren’t
you ashamed to be the majority? If you still aren’t, just wait, we’ll
soon make it impossible for you to live here. We will provide quotas
for all available minorities everywhere and, wherever possible, divide
the majority into mutually exclusive categories so that they cease
to be the majority. In other words, there will remain no Hindu Indian
after we are through with our vivisection plans. There will only be
minorities of various hues who will compete with one another for crumbs.
We, the Congress and Left, will happily rule thereafter, employing
the same policy the British did. Positive discrimination is an old-fashioned,
discarded practice. The Government of India has unveiled a unique
policy package called “Negative Discrimination”. This involves looking
at the country’s majority negatively. It is intended to eliminate
their self-esteem, make them emotional and psychological wrecks and
send them on a permanent guilt trip for having born into a “majority”
family.
It
is in pursuit of this diabolical policy of negative discrimination
that the Government has sent out a questionnaire to the armed forces
demanding a Muslim head count. In fairness, the idea didn’t emanate
from Arjun Singh although he is usually credited with all such diabolical
plots. The head count demand is part of an official committee’s recommendation.
And who heads this committee? Ex-Justice Rajender Sachar, an infamous
bleeding heart, part of the brigade that would have been happy if
we gifted Kashmir and Punjab away and gradually self-destructed India
itself. It might be argued by non-bleeding hearts, well-meaning people,
what’s wrong with a headcount? Shouldn’t the Indian Army reflect the
country’s communal composition? But then, if we agree to a quota system,
why stop at Muslims? Why not Christians, Buddhists, neo-Buddhists,
Jains, Parsees, animists, atheists, agnostics, literates, neo-literates
and various castes including “backward” Muslims and “Dalit” Christians?
Readers
may wonder why I have not mentioned Sikhs so far. In order to accommodate
so many other religious and social groups according to their numerical
proportion, it would be necessary to throw out most of the Sikhs from
the armed forces. This is because they are over represented, by virtue
of their colonial classification as a martial race, like the Gurkhas.
In the 70s, it was common to see a wall writing that posed: “Sikhs
in Army 33 per cent to 12 per cent. Why?” Issued by one Bakshi Jagdev
Singh (who, he?) this query made people aware how disproportionately
Sikhs had been taken into the Army. And public opinion on that? A
jolly good thing too. As sword-arm of the Indian people, ever since
Guru Tegh Bahadur sacrificed his life to uphold the Hindu right to
wear the janeu, Sikhs were rightly inducted into the Army. Does anybody
dare evoke the quota argument here? It would be interesting to know
how Rajender Sachar whose heart once bled for the “misguided youth”
of Punjab (read mercenaries on ISI’s payroll) reacts to the likely
termination of service of many Sikhs from the Army in order to implement
the hidden agenda for a Muslim quota?
The
Government says it is distressed by the breakdown of the traditional
national consensus on foreign policy. But the UPA regime has broken
a much bigger consensus. That is not just on foreign policy but also
on the national interest itself. The move to amend the Foreigners’
Act to make it mandatory to give every illegal immigrant a “fair hearing”
through a tribunal amounts to extending the disgraceful and legally
invalid IMDT Act of Assam to the entire country. India is not Britain
or France or even the US for that matter - developed countries that
have to deal with just a few thousand people trying to sneak in by
illegitimate means every year. India faces what the Supreme Court
has correctly termed “external aggression” as a result of lakhs of
Bangladeshis openly migrating to this country. They are provided ration
cards, helped to grab land and jobs and also enlisted as voters. Estimates
of such illegal infiltrators range from 1.5 crore to 4 crore. The
entire system has been manipulated by politicians, primarily the Congress
and now the CPI(M). The Congress enacted a ludicrous piece of legislation
called the IMDT Act wherein the onus of proving the charge of being
an illegal migrant rested on the accuser and not the accused! No wonder
just about 700 persons were identified as illegal immigrants in 20
years.
Now,
to assuage Muslim sentiment, apparently stung by the Apex Court’s
striking down of the Act, the Government proposes an even more pernicious
piece of law that will make virtually impossible the admittedly difficult
task of physically sending back even one Bangladeshi infiltrator.
I do not believe a single Indian Muslim supports the idea of wholesale
import of Bangladeshis to this country. No patriotic Indian would
entertain such thoughts and Indian Muslims, barring a minuscule few,
are genuine patriots. Therefore, wooing Indian Muslim sentiment by
facilitating a free run of this country for illegal Bangladeshi aggressors
is a non-starter. If anything, the backlash, if and when it comes,
will unfortunately widen the gulf between communities. That is why
it is a matter of concern that the Government is adding fuel to the
simmering anger of the majority. Once the majority is convinced that
its own Government is purposefully discriminating against it, India
might get engulfed in a devastating fire that those who are igniting
it will fail to control.
(The
writer is the Editor of the Daily Pioneer and Rajya Sabha MP)